Re: Tid scan improvements

On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 20:37, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 09:45, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 11:05, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> > > How does this interact with rescans?
> >
> > We must call table_rescan() before calling table_set_tidrange() again.
> > That perhaps could be documented better. I'm just unsure if that
> > should be documented in tableam.h or if it's a restriction that only
> > needs to exist in heapam.c
>
> I've changed things around so that we no longer explicitly call
> table_rescan() in nodeTidrangescan.c. Instead table_set_tidrange()
> does a rescan call. I also adjusted the documentation to mention that
> changing the tid range starts the scan again.  This does mean we'll do
> a ->scan_rescan() the first time we do table_set_tidrange(). I'm not
> all that sure that matters.

I've pushed this now. I did end up changing the function name in
tableam.h so that we no longer expose the table_set_tidrange().
Instead, the range is set by either table_beginscan_tidrange() or
table_rescan_tidrange().  There's no need to worry about what would
happen if someone were to change the TID range mid-scan.

Apart from that, I adjusted a few comments and changed the regression
tests a little to get rid of the tidrangescan_empty table. This was
created to ensure empty tables work correctly. Instead, I just did
those tests before populating the tidrangescan table.  This just makes
the test run a little faster since we're creating and dropping 1 less
table.

David