Horton

Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-07-31T02:11:46Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Fri, 3 Jul 2020 at 07:47, James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com> wrote:
> Patch using int64 attached.

I added this to the open items list for PG13.

David

Commits

  1. Use int64 instead of long in incremental sort code