Re: Use uppercase keywords in foreign key tutorial

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>, Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-10-29T21:24:30Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Thu, 30 Oct 2025 at 09:48, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 04:34:45PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >> I noticed the patch also changes some column types to lowercase:
> >> ...
> >> -    category_N TEXT
> >> +    category_N text
> >>
> >> FWIW I tend to use uppercase for those, too, but I'm not sure there is a
> >> preferred style for the docs.
>
> > Agreed, uppercase is better for type names.
>
> "text" is not a keyword according to either us or the SQL standard.
> I agree that there's some reason to capitalize things that are
> grammar keywords, such as INTEGER or VARCHAR, but it's a big stretch
> to go from that to capitalizing everything that is a type name.
> Would you capitalize user-defined type names?

Going by: git grep -i "\btext\b," we're fairly consistently using
lower case, so FWIW, when I looked, I thought Eric's change made
sense.

How about if Eric just drops the portion of the patch that alters the
casing of the types and leaves all the keyword uppercasing stuff in.
Any objections to that part?

David



Commits

  1. Doc: more uppercase keywords in SQLs

  2. Doc: use uppercase keywords in SQLs