Re: Adjust Memoize hit_ratio calculation
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-03-21T19:48:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 09:41, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Because that's being changed in v16, I think it might also be a good > idea to fix the hit_ratio calculation problem reported by David > Johnston in [1]. In the attached, I've adjusted David's calculation > slightly so that we divide by Max(ndistinct, est_cache_entries) > instead of ndistinct. This saves from overestimating when ndistinct > is smaller than est_cache_entries. I'd rather fix this now for v16 > than wait until v17 and further adjust the Memoize costing. I've now pushed this change. David
Commits
-
Correct Memoize's estimated cache hit ratio calculation
- f48b4f892f76 16.0 landed