Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
Cc: "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>, Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-04-10T23:45:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025 at 02:01, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote: > I created an entry for the July CF > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5691/ > > ... and I realized I forgot to include David's code comment patch yesterday, > Reattaching both patches. I've pushed the code comment patch. For the docs patch, the fact you're having to name specific fields in the note at the bottom makes me think the details should be added to the row for the field in question instead. David
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add code comment explaining ins_since_vacuum and aborted inserts
- 530050d8d285 18.0 landed
-
Trigger autovacuum based on number of INSERTs
- b07642dbcd8d 13.0 cited