Re: Docs pg_restore: Shouldn't there be a note about -n ?
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>
Cc: Florents Tselai <florents.tselai@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-01-04T23:25:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 26 Oct 2025 at 05:32, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> wrote: > > On 2024-Sep-26, Florents Tselai wrote: > > but the -e note on the distinction between installing binaries / creating > > an extension I think it's important. > > Hmm, ok, but I think that's a slightly unrelated topic because the shlib > is not a database object. Maybe it would be more appropriate to add a > mention of this directly in the docs for -e instead of trying to cram it > in the note about other database objects. I'll wait for you to propose > something for that part. This seems to be waiting on Florents. I've adjusted the CF entry to reflect that. Florents, are you planning on coming back to this? David
Commits
-
Docs: consolidate dependency notes in pg_dump and pg_restore
- 78bf28e3bf50 19 (unreleased) landed