Re: Option to not use ringbuffer in VACUUM, using it in failsafe mode
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-04-18T05:46:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 18 Apr 2023 at 09:21, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > Are we still thinking that reordering the VACUUM (and ANALYZE) options > makes sense. And, if so, should it be alphabetical within parameter > category? That is, all actual parameters (e.g. FULL and FREEZE) are > alphabetically organized first followed by all parameter types (e.g. > boolean and size) alphabetically listed? I've opened a thread for that [1]. David [1] https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvo1eWbt5PVpk0G=yCbBNgLU7KaRP6dCBHpNbFaBjyGyQA@mail.gmail.com
Commits
-
Add unit to vacuum_buffer_usage_limit value in postgresql.conf.sample.
- b72f564d87d1 16.0 landed
-
Improve VACUUM/ANALYZE BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT docs
- c0235013c13b 16.0 landed
-
Add --buffer-usage-limit option to vacuumdb
- ae78cae3be62 16.0 landed
-
Add VACUUM/ANALYZE BUFFER_USAGE_LIMIT option
- 1cbbee033857 16.0 landed
-
Move various prechecks from vacuum() into ExecVacuum()
- b9b125b9c143 16.0 landed
-
Always make a BufferAccessStrategy for ANALYZE
- bccd6908ca82 16.0 landed
-
Rename BufferAccessStrategyData.ring_size to nbuffers
- 8d928e3a9fe7 16.0 landed
-
Disable vacuum's use of a buffer access strategy during failsafe
- 4830f1024325 16.0 landed
-
Only make buffer strategy for vacuum when it's likely needed
- 32fbe0239b03 16.0 landed
-
Remove some global variables from vacuum.c
- 3f476c953495 16.0 landed
-
Doc: add Buffer Access Strategy to the glossary
- c8f8d0eb1868 16.0 landed