Re: PG 15 (and to a smaller degree 14) regression due to ExprEvalStep size

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Date: 2022-06-28T19:18:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 at 05:21, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> On 2022-06-17 14:14:54 +1200, David Rowley wrote:
> > So, there appears to be no performance regression due to the extra
> > indirection. There's maybe even some gains due to the smaller step
> > size.
>
> "smaller step size"?

I mean smaller sizeof(ExprEvalStep).

David



Commits

  1. JSON_TABLE: Add support for NESTED paths and columns

  2. Add basic JSON_TABLE() functionality

  3. Add SQL/JSON query functions

  4. Add soft error handling to some expression nodes

  5. Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softly

  6. Refactor code used by jsonpath executor to fetch variables

  7. Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions

  8. SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicate

  9. SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functions

  10. Add static assertion ensuring sizeof(ExprEvalStep) <= 64 bytes

  11. Remove size increase in ExprEvalStep caused by hashed saops

  12. pgstat: reduce timer overhead by leaving timer running.

  13. expression eval: Fix EEOP_JSON_CONSTRUCTOR and EEOP_JSONEXPR size.

  14. SQL/JSON query functions

  15. Speedup ScalarArrayOpExpr evaluation