Re: Intermittent test plan change in "privileges" test on BF animal prion
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-06-09T03:48:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 9 Jun 2020 at 15:41, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > It does seem plausible, given how slow prion is that autovacuum might > > be trigger after the manual vacuum somehow and building stats with > > just 1k buckets instead of 10k. > > Hmm ... that's a plausible theory, perhaps. I forget: does autovac > recheck, after acquiring the requisite table lock, whether the table > still needs to be processed? It does, but I wondered if there was a window after the manual vacuum resets n_ins_since_vacuum and between when autovacuum looks at it. David
Commits
-
Repair unstable regression test.
- 6df8fb391b0b 13.0 landed
- 05dea2427c2f 14.0 landed