Horton

Re: Why is DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST so insanely low?

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-11-02T01:32:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 11:16, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'd be happy if anyone else would like to try the same experiment to
> see if there's some other value of DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST that might
> suit better.

No takers on the additional testing so I've pushed the patch that
increases it to 0.2.

David

Commits

  1. Stabilize postgres_fdw tests on 32-bit machines

  2. Attempt to stabilize postgres_fdw tests

  3. Increase DEFAULT_FDW_TUPLE_COST from 0.01 to 0.2

  4. Add postgres_fdw contrib module.