Horton
Menu

Re: Why is parula failing?

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

View thread
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, tharar@amazon.com
Date: 2024-03-20T21:35:45Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 08:58, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I suppose we could attach "autovacuum=off" settings to these tables,
> but it doesn't seem to me that that should be necessary.  These test
> cases are several years old and haven't given trouble before.
> Moreover, if that's necessary then there are a lot of other regression
> tests that would presumably need the same treatment.

Is it worth running that animal with log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0
so we can see what's going on in terms of auto-vacuum auto-analyze in
the log?

David

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables