Re: Why is parula failing?

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-10T00:54:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 15:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> Still no partition_prune failures on master since the compiler version
> change.  There has been one [1] in REL_16_STABLE. I'm thinking it
> might be worth backpatching the partition_prune debug to REL_16_STABLE
> to see if we can learn anything new from it.

Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade.
Again reltuples == 48.

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-04-10%2000%3A27%3A02

David



Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables