Re: Why is parula failing?
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Robins Tharakan <tharakan@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-10T00:54:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 at 15:48, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Still no partition_prune failures on master since the compiler version > change. There has been one [1] in REL_16_STABLE. I'm thinking it > might be worth backpatching the partition_prune debug to REL_16_STABLE > to see if we can learn anything new from it. Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade. Again reltuples == 48. https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=parula&dt=2024-04-10%2000%3A27%3A02 David
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"
- ec1a405adc24 17.0 landed
-
Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test
- 1db689715d44 17.0 landed
-
Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables
- a0390f6ca6c7 17.0 cited