Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, Andy Fan <zhihui.fan1213@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-23T11:42:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v17-0001-Cache-PathTarget-and-RestrictInfo-s-volatility.patch (text/plain) patch v17-0001
- v17-0002-Allow-estimate_num_groups-to-pass-back-further-d.patch (text/plain) patch v17-0002
- v17-0003-Allow-users-of-simplehash.h-to-perform-direct-de.patch (text/plain) patch v17-0003
- v17-0004-Add-Result-Cache-executor-node.patch (text/plain) patch v17-0004
- v17-0005-Remove-code-duplication-in-nodeResultCache.c.patch (text/plain) patch v17-0005
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 23:57, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 at 14:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I'm -1 on doing it exactly that way, because you're expending > > the cost of those lookups without certainty that you need the answer. > > I had in mind something more like the way that we cache selectivity > > estimates in RestrictInfo, in which the value is cached when first > > demanded and then re-used on subsequent checks --- see in > > clause_selectivity_ext, around line 750. You do need a way for the > > field to have a "not known yet" value, but that's not hard. Moreover, > > this sort of approach can be less invasive than what you did here, > > because the caching behavior can be hidden inside > > contain_volatile_functions, rather than having all the call sites > > know about it explicitly. > > I coded up something more along the lines of what I think you had in > mind for the 0001 patch. I've now cleaned up the 0001 patch. I ended up changing a few places where we pass the RestrictInfo->clause to contain_volatile_functions() to instead pass the RestrictInfo itself so that there's a possibility of caching the volatility property for a subsequent call. I also made a pass over the remaining patches and for the 0004 patch, aside from the name, "Result Cache", I think that it's ready to go. We should consider before RC1 if we should have enable_resultcache switch on or off by default. Does anyone care to have a final look at these patches? I'd like to start pushing them fairly soon. David
Commits
-
Add Result Cache executor node (take 2)
- 9eacee2e62d8 14.0 landed
-
Add Result Cache executor node
- b6002a796dc0 14.0 landed
-
Allow estimate_num_groups() to pass back further details about the estimation
- ed934d4fa30f 14.0 landed
-
Allow users of simplehash.h to perform direct deletions
- ff53d7b159b9 14.0 landed
-
Cache if PathTarget and RestrictInfos contain volatile functions
- f58b230ed0db 14.0 landed
-
Fix pull_varnos' miscomputation of relids set for a PlaceHolderVar.
- 55dc86eca70b 14.0 cited