Horton
Menu

Re: Why is parula failing?

David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>

View thread
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-27T09:35:19Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 at 18:28, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> > Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging,
> > so don't get to know what reltuples was set to.
>
> Let's wait a bit to see if it fails in HEAD ... but if not, would
> it be reasonable to back-patch the additional debugging output?

I think REL_16_STABLE has told us that it's not an auto-vacuum issue.
I'm uncertain what a few more failures in master will tell us aside
from if reltuples == 48 is consistent or if that value is going to
fluctuate.

Let's give it a week and see if it fails a few more times.

David

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"

  2. Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test

  3. Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables