Re: Why is parula failing?
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
From: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
To: "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar@amazon.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-03-27T02:11:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 21:03, Tharakan, Robins <tharar@amazon.com> wrote: > > > David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes: > > It would be good to have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 on this machine for a while. > > - Have set log_autovacuum_min_duration=0 on parula and a test run came out okay. > - Also added REL_16_STABLE to the branches being tested (in case it matters here). Thanks for doing that. I see PG_16_STABLE has failed twice already with the same issue. I don't see any autovacuum / autoanalyze in the log, so I guess that rules out auto vacuum activity causing this. Unfortunately, REL_16_STABLE does not have the additional debugging, so don't get to know what reltuples was set to. David
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revert "Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test"
- ec1a405adc24 17.0 landed
-
Temporarily install debugging in partition_prune test
- 1db689715d44 17.0 landed
-
Review wording on tablespaces w.r.t. partitioned tables
- a0390f6ca6c7 17.0 cited