Thread
Commits
-
Doc: clarify partitioned table limitations
- 1630cad74092 11.18 landed
- 844ac0967e39 12.13 landed
- b70db6c83073 13.9 landed
- a254545a54a2 14.6 landed
- 6ce4c4d83101 15.0 landed
- 519be095f2bf 16.0 landed
-
Clarify restriction on partitioned tables primary key / unique indexes
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> — 2022-09-02T09:44:08Z
Over on [1], there was a question about why it wasn't possible to create the following table: CREATE TABLE foobar( id BIGINT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, baz VARCHAR NULL DEFAULT NULL ) PARTITION BY HASH(my_func(id)); The above is disallowed by 2 checks in DefineIndex(). 1. If the partitioned key contains an expression we disallow the addition of the constraint, per: /* * It may be possible to support UNIQUE constraints when partition * keys are expressions, but is it worth it? Give up for now. */ if (key->partattrs[i] == 0) ereport(ERROR, 2. We insist that the primary key / unique constraint contain all of the columns that the partitioned key does. We only mention #2 in the docs [2], but we don't mention anything about if the columns can be part of a function call or expression or not, per: "Unique constraints (and hence primary keys) on partitioned tables must include all the partition key columns. This limitation exists because the individual indexes making up the constraint can only directly enforce uniqueness within their own partitions; therefore, the partition structure itself must guarantee that there are not duplicates in different partitions." The attached attempts to clarify these restrictions more accurately based on the current code's restrictions. If there's no objections or suggestions for better wording, I'd like to commit the attached. David [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAH7vdhNF0EdYZz3GLpgE3RSJLwWLhEk7A_fiKS9dPBT3Dz_3eA@mail.gmail.com [2] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/ddl-partitioning.html -
Re: Clarify restriction on partitioned tables primary key / unique indexes
Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> — 2022-09-02T10:01:09Z
Op 02-09-2022 om 11:44 schreef David Rowley: > Over on [1], there was a question about why it wasn't possible to > create the following table: > > CREATE TABLE foobar( > id BIGINT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, > baz VARCHAR NULL DEFAULT NULL > ) PARTITION BY HASH(my_func(id)); > > > The attached attempts to clarify these restrictions more accurately > based on the current code's restrictions. > > If there's no objections or suggestions for better wording, I'd like > to commit the attached. Minimal changes: 'To create a unique or primary key constraints on partitioned table' should be 'To create unique or primary key constraints on partitioned tables' Erik
-
Re: Clarify restriction on partitioned tables primary key / unique indexes
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> — 2022-09-02T10:06:48Z
On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 22:01, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Minimal changes: > > 'To create a unique or primary key constraints on partitioned table' > > should be > > 'To create unique or primary key constraints on partitioned tables' Thanks. I ended up adjusting it to: "To create a unique or primary key constraint on a partitioned table," David
-
Re: Clarify restriction on partitioned tables primary key / unique indexes
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> — 2022-09-05T06:46:48Z
On Fri, 2 Sept 2022 at 22:06, David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks. I ended up adjusting it to: > > "To create a unique or primary key constraint on a partitioned table," and pushed. Thanks for having a look at this Erik. David