Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Attachments
- v36-0001-Consider-low-startup-cost-when-adding-partial-pa.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v36-0001
- v36-0003-Consider-incremental-sort-paths-in-additional-pl.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v36-0003
- v36-0002-Implement-incremental-sort.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v36-0002
- v36-0004-A-couple-more-places-for-incremental-sort.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v36-0004
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:44 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: ... > Now, a couple comments about parts 0001 - 0003 of the patch ... > > 1) I see a bunch of failures in the regression test, due to minor > differences in the explain output. All the differences are about minor > changes in memory usage, like this: > > - "Sort Space Used": 30, + > + "Sort Space Used": 29, + > > I'm not sure if it happens on my machine only, but maybe the test is not > entirely stable. make check passes on multiple machines for me; what arch/distro are you using? Is there a better way to test these? I would prefer these code paths have test coverage, but the standard SQL tests don't leave a good way to handle stuff like this. Is TAP the only alternative, and do you think it'd be worth considering? > 2) I think this bit in ExecReScanIncrementalSort is wrong: > > node->sort_Done = false; > tuplesort_end(node->fullsort_state); > node->prefixsort_state = NULL; > tuplesort_end(node->fullsort_state); > node->prefixsort_state = NULL; > node->bound_Done = 0; > > Notice both places reset fullsort_state and set prefixsort_state to > NULL. Another thing is that I'm not sure it's fine to pass NULL to > tuplesort_end (my guess is tuplesort_free will fail when it gets NULL). Fixed. James
Commits
-
Further adjustments to Hashagg EXPLAIN ANALYZE output
- 40efbf8706cd 14.0 cited
-
Rework EXPLAIN format for incremental sort
- 6a918c3ac8a6 13.0 landed
-
Fix typos and improve incremental sort comments
- 1a40d37a9faf 13.0 landed
-
Stabilize incremental_sort tests
- cea09246e578 13.0 landed
-
Minor improvements in Incremental Sort explain
- d22782a5392f 13.0 landed
-
Consider Incremental Sort paths at additional places
- ba3e76cc571e 13.0 landed
-
Fix representation of SORT_TYPE_STILL_IN_PROGRESS.
- c7654f6a3779 13.0 landed
-
Fix failures in incremental_sort due to number of workers
- 23ba3b5ee278 13.0 landed
-
Fix show_incremental_sort_info with force_parallel_mode
- 7d6d82a52493 13.0 landed
-
Implement Incremental Sort
- d2d8a229bc58 13.0 landed
-
Fix handling of "Subplans Removed" field in EXPLAIN output.
- 7d91b604d9b5 13.0 cited
-
Fix EXPLAIN (SETTINGS) to follow policy about when to print empty fields.
- 3ec20c7091e9 13.0 cited
-
Ensure plpgsql result tuples have the right composite type marking.
- 5683b34956b4 13.0 cited
-
Propagate sort instrumentation from workers back to leader.
- bf11e7ee2e36 11.0 cited
-
Make new regression test case parallel-safe, and improve its output.
- 1177ab1dabf7 11.0 cited
-
Push limit through subqueries to underlying sort, where possible.
- 1f6d515a67ec 11.0 cited
-
Fix inappropriate printing of never-measured times in EXPLAIN.
- 4b234fd8bf21 9.6.0 cited
-
Fix some infelicities in EXPLAIN output for parallel query plans.
- 8ebb69f85445 9.6.0 cited