Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 28 June 2012 22:22, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
>> All in all, I don't think this can be a very productive discussion
>> unless someone just pitches a equal or better name overall in terms of
>> conciseness and descriptiveness.  I'd rather optimize for those
>> attributes.  Old advice is old; that's the nature of the beast.
>
> Robert suggested wal_flush_delay, which does more accurately describe
> what happens now.

Well, I learned something from reading this name, having not followed
the mechanism too closely.  I like it.

-- 
fdr