Re: Should we add crc32 in libpgport?
Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
From: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-02-23T22:18:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- Move-CRC-tables-to-a-separate-include-file-and-libpg-v3.patch (application/octet-stream)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote: > Thoughts? Thinking unnecessary. Motion is progress. Here is a patch that uses this exact plan: pgport for the tables, broken out into a header file that is included in the building of libpgport. I have confirmed by objdump -t that multiple copies of the table are not included in the postgres binary and the bloat has not occurred. The patch has a detailed cover letter, as per the previous submissions. -- fdr