Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)

Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>

From: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-20T06:28:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com> wrote:
> I added programming around various NULL returns reading GUCs in this
> revision, v4.

Okay, one more of those fridge-logic bugs.  Sorry for the noise. v5.

A missing PG_RETHROW to get the properly finally-esque semantics:

--- a/contrib/dblink/dblink.c
+++ b/contrib/dblink/dblink.c
@@ -642,7 +642,10 @@ dblink_fetch(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
  }
  PG_CATCH();
  {
+ /* Pop any set GUCs, if necessary */
  restoreLocalGucs(&rgs);
+
+ PG_RE_THROW();
  }
  PG_END_TRY();

This was easy to add a regression test to exercise, and so I did (not
displayed here).

--
fdr

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix postgres_fdw's issues with inconsistent interpretation of data values.