Re: In-placre persistance change of a relation

Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>

From: Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>

To: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>

Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, rjuju123@gmail.com, jakub.wartak@tomtom.com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2022-07-06T15:44:18Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

pg_dump: Refactor getIndexes()
- e2c52beecdea 15.0 cited
Optimize DropRelFileNodesAllBuffers() for recovery.
- bea449c635c0 14.0 cited

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 2:36 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
<horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> At Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:33:18 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote in
> > I don't think this can be commited to 15. So I post the fixed version
> > then move this to the next CF.
>
> Then done. Thanks!

Hello! This patchset will need to be rebased over latest -- looks like
b74e94dc27f (Rethink PROCSIGNAL_BARRIER_SMGRRELEASE) and 5c279a6d350
(Custom WAL Resource Managers) are interfering.

Thanks,
--Jacob