Re: Stack Smashing Detected When Executing initdb
Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@gmail.com>
From: Kashif Zeeshan <kashi.zeeshan@gmail.com>
To: Xu Haorong <db_haorong@outlook.com>
Cc: "pgsql-general@postgresql.org" <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-06-23T08:50:18Z
Lists: pgsql-general
Hi Xu To pinpoint the issue, please use gdb debugger to get the backtrace to exactly find out where the error is occurring and you can then do the required setups. For Reference : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50093327/how-do-i-solve-postgresql-aborted-core-dumped-error Thanks Kashif Zeeshan On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 12:19 PM Xu Haorong <db_haorong@outlook.com> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Today I tried to build the latest devel version of PostgreSQL(commit > 70a845c04a47645b58f8276a6b3ab201ea8ec426). The compilation was successful, > but when I ran initdb an error occured: > > /usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data > The files belonging to this database system will be owned by user > "postgres". > This user must also own the server process. > > The database cluster will be initialized with locale "en_US.UTF-8". > The default database encoding has accordingly been set to "UTF8". > The default text search configuration will be set to "english". > > Data page checksums are disabled. > > fixing permissions on existing directory /usr/local/pgsql/data ... ok > creating subdirectories ... ok > selecting dynamic shared memory implementation ... posix > selecting default "max_connections" ... 100 > selecting default "shared_buffers" ... 128MB > selecting default time zone ... Asia/Shanghai > creating configuration files ... ok > running bootstrap script ... ok > *performing post-bootstrap initialization ... *** **stack smashing > detected** ***: terminated* > *Aborted (core dumped)* > *child process exited with exit code 134* > *initdb: removing contents of data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data"* > > After searching for solutions on the Internet, I disabled the stack > smashing protector by performing > *./configure CC='clang -fno-stack-protector'* > > However, the problem still exists. Is there anyone else having this issue? > > Regards, > Haorong Xu >
Commits
-
Remove extra comment at TableAmRoutine.scan_analyze_next_block
- 70a845c04a47 17.0 cited