Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join
amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
From: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro.fujita@gmail.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-09-05T04:23:28Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Suppress unused-variable warning.
- 401418ca6a68 13.0 landed
-
Allow partitionwise joins in more cases.
- c8434d64ce03 13.0 landed
-
Avoid crash in partitionwise join planning under GEQO.
- 7ad6498fd5a6 12.0 cited
- d70c147fa217 11.3 cited
-
Disable support for partitionwise joins in problematic cases.
- 7cfdc77023ad 12.0 cited
-
Add plan_cache_mode setting
- f7cb2842bf47 12.0 cited
-
Add test for partitionwise join involving default partition.
- 4513d3a4be0b 12.0 cited
-
Revise API for partition_rbound_cmp/partition_rbound_datum_cmp.
- b0229235564f 11.0 landed
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:40 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Fujita-san, amul, > > CFbot complains that Fujita-san submitted a patch that doesn't apply, > which makes sense since the necessary previous patch was only referred > to without being resubmitted. I suggest to always post all patches > together with each resubmission so that it can be checked automatically > by the cf bot: http://commitfest.cputube.org/etsuro-fujita.html > > Understood and sorry about that. I'm not clear on who the author of this patch is, now. Also, I'm not > sure what the *status* is. Are we waiting for Fujita-san to review this > patch? > Yes, we are waiting for Fujita-san to review. Fujita-san has started a review and proposed some enhancement which I reviewed in the last update. I think soon Fujita-san might post the complete patch including his changes. Regards, Amul