Re: TAP test for recovery_end_command
Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
From: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
To: Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-09-13T13:09:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- TAP-test_recovery_end_command_v2.patch (application/x-patch) patch v2
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 5:56 AM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2021, at 8:18 AM, Amul Sul wrote: > > The attached patch adds a small test for recovery_end_command execution. > > Additional coverage is always a good thing. > Thanks for the confirmation. > Currently, patch tests execution of recovery_end_command by creating > dummy file, I am not wedded only to this approach, other suggestions > also welcome. > > This test file is for archiving only. It seems 020_archive_status.pl is more > appropriate for testing this parameter. > Ok, moved to 020_archive_status.pl in the attached version. > Also, we don't have a good test for archive_cleanup_command as well, I > am not sure how we could test that which executes with every > restart-point. > > Setup a replica and stop it. It triggers a restartpoint during the shutdown. Yeah, added that test too. I triggered the restartpoint via a CHECKPOINT command in the attached version. Note that I haven't tested the current version on Windows, will cross-check that tomorrow. Regards, Amul
Commits
-
Add TAP test for archive_cleanup_command and recovery_end_command
- 46dea2419ee7 15.0 landed