Re: [HACKERS] advanced partition matching algorithm for partition-wise join

amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>

From: amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>, Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com
Date: 2019-03-05T10:14:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Suppress unused-variable warning.

  2. Allow partitionwise joins in more cases.

  3. Avoid crash in partitionwise join planning under GEQO.

  4. Disable support for partitionwise joins in problematic cases.

  5. Add plan_cache_mode setting

  6. Add test for partitionwise join involving default partition.

  7. Revise API for partition_rbound_cmp/partition_rbound_datum_cmp.

Attachments

Attached is the rebased atop of the latest master head(35bc0ec7c8).

Regards,
Amul Sul

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:05 AM amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:

> There are few whitespaces in 0002 patch that I have fixed in the attached
> version.
> Rest of the patches are untouched.
>
> Ill continue my review and testing.
>
> Regards,
> Amul
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:26 PM Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> wrote:
>
>> (2019/01/22 21:38), Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> > Will continue to review.
>>
>> I rebased the patch set against the latest HEAD.  Attached is a new
>> version.  I'll move this to the next CF, and continue to review it.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Etsuro Fujita
>>
>