Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
From: Amul Sul <sulamul@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
Cc: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Joel Jacobson <joel@compiler.org>
Date: 2025-01-29T12:47:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add support for NOT ENFORCED in foreign key constraints
- eec0040c4bcd 18.0 landed
-
Expand test a bit
- 5d5f415816a6 18.0 landed
-
refactor: Pass relation OID instead of Relation to createForeignKeyCheckTriggers()
- ef7a5af77d44 18.0 landed
-
refactor: Split ATExecAlterConstraintInternal()
- 639238b978fe 18.0 landed
-
refactor: Move some code that updates pg_constraint to a separate function
- a3280e2a494f 18.0 landed
-
Move RemoveInheritedConstraint() call slightly earlier
- dabccf45139a 18.0 landed
-
refactor: Split tryAttachPartitionForeignKey()
- 1d26c2d2c4b8 18.0 landed
-
refactor: re-add ATExecAlterChildConstr()
- 64224a834ce4 18.0 landed
-
Add ATAlterConstraint struct for ALTER .. CONSTRAINT
- 80d7f990496b 18.0 landed
-
refactor: split ATExecAlterConstrRecurse()
- 7a947ed25b54 18.0 landed
-
Add support for NOT ENFORCED in CHECK constraints
- ca87c415e2fc 18.0 landed
Attachments
- v11-0002-refactor-Split-tryAttachPartitionForeignKey.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0002
- v11-0003-refactor-Pass-Relid-instead-of-Relation-to-creat.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0003
- v11-0004-refactor-Change-ATExecAlterConstrRecurse-argumen.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0004
- v11-0005-Remove-hastriggers-flag-check-before-fetching-FK.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0005
- v11-0006-Add-support-for-NOT-ENFORCED-in-foreign-key-cons.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0006
- v11-0007-Merge-the-parent-and-child-constraints-with-diff.patch (application/x-patch) patch v11-0007
On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 9:47 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote: > > > In 0006, this change in the test output should be improved: > > > > -- XXX: error message is misleading here > > ALTER TABLE unique_tbl ALTER CONSTRAINT unique_tbl_i_key ENFORCED; > > -ERROR: ALTER CONSTRAINT statement constraints cannot be marked ENFORCED > > -LINE 1: ...TABLE unique_tbl ALTER CONSTRAINT unique_tbl_i_key ENFORCED; > > - ^ > > +ERROR: constraint "unique_tbl_i_key" of relation "unique_tbl" is not a > > foreign key constraint > > > > Maybe this should be along the lines of "ALTER CONSTRAINT ... ENFORCED > > is not supported for %s constraints" or something like that. > > > > Ok, let me see what can be done here. I tried to improve the error message by adding the following details for this case in the attached version: +ERROR: cannot alter enforceability of constraint "unique_tbl_i_key" of relation "unique_tbl" +DETAIL: Enforceability can only be altered for foreign key constraints. > On 28.01.25 11:58, Amul Sul wrote: > >> This behavior is not correct: > >> > >> +-- Changing it back to ENFORCED will leave the constraint in the NOT > >> VALID state > >> +ALTER TABLE FKTABLE ALTER CONSTRAINT fktable_ftest1_fkey ENFORCED; > >> +-- Which needs to be explicitly validated. > >> +ALTER TABLE FKTABLE VALIDATE CONSTRAINT fktable_ftest1_fkey; > >> > >> Setting the constraint to enforced should enforce it immediately. This > >> SQL statement is covered by the SQL standard. Also, I think it's a > >> better user experience if you don't require two steps. > >> > > Let me clarify: the constraint will be enforced for new inserts and > > updates, but it won't be validated against existing data, so those > > will remain marked as invalid. > > Yes, I understand, but that is the not the correct behavior of this > command per SQL standard. I haven't worked on this yet due to a lack of clarity, and it requires further discussion. The behavior will remain the same as the previous version. The attached set is the rebased version on top of the latest master head and includes the aforementioned error message improvements. Regards, Amul