Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
To: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Date: 2023-12-21T21:36:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 6:12 PM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 5:28 PM Melanie Plageman > <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: > > When there are no indexes on the relation, we can set would-be dead > > items LP_UNUSED and remove them during pruning. This saves us a vacuum > > WAL record, reducing WAL volume (and time spent writing and syncing > > WAL). > ... > > Note that (on principle) this patch set is on top of the bug fix I > > proposed in [1]. > > > > [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_YiL%3D44GvGnt1dpYouDSSoV7wzxVoXs8m3p311rp-TVQQ%40mail.gmail.com > > Rebased on top of fix in b2e237afddc56a and registered for the january fest > https://commitfest.postgresql.org/46/4665/ I got an off-list question about whether or not this codepath is exercised in existing regression tests. It is -- vacuum.sql tests include those which vacuum a table with no indexes and tuples that can be deleted. I also looked through [1] to see if there were any user-facing docs which happened to mention the exact implementation details of how and when tuples are deleted by vacuum. I didn't see anything like that, so I don't think there are user-facing docs which need updating. - Melanie [1] https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/routine-vacuuming.html
Commits
-
Combine FSM updates for prune and no-prune cases.
- 5eafacd2797d 17.0 landed
-
Remove LVPagePruneState.
- e313a6113704 17.0 landed
-
Move VM update code from lazy_scan_heap() to lazy_scan_prune().
- cb970240f13d 17.0 landed
-
Optimize vacuuming of relations with no indexes.
- c120550edb86 17.0 landed
-
Be more consistent about whether to update the FSM while vacuuming.
- 45d395cd75ff 17.0 landed
-
Remove hastup from LVPagePruneState.
- e2d5b3b9b643 17.0 landed
-
Use scanned_pages to decide when to failsafe check.
- 07eef53955ea 16.0 cited
-
Simplify lazy_scan_heap's handling of scanned pages.
- 44fa84881fff 15.0 cited
-
While vacuuming a large table, update upper-level FSM data every so often.
- 851a26e26637 11.0 cited