Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Ensure vacuum removes all visibly dead tuples older than OldestXmin
- 06bf404cd07b 16.4 landed
- 45ce054c02b8 14.13 landed
- dc6354c67017 15.8 landed
-
Combine freezing and pruning steps in VACUUM
- 6dbb490261a6 17.0 cited
-
Handle non-chain tuples outside of heap_prune_chain()
- 6f47f6883151 17.0 cited
-
Fix false reports in pg_visibility
- e85662df44ff 17.0 cited
-
Remove retry loop in heap_page_prune().
- 1ccc1e05ae8f 17.0 cited
-
vacuumlazy.c: document vistest and OldestXmin.
- 73f6ec3d3c8d 15.0 cited
-
Deduplicate choice of horizon for a relation procarray.c.
- d9d8aa9bb9aa 15.0 cited
-
Remove tupgone special case from vacuumlazy.c.
- 8523492d4e34 14.0 cited
-
Simplify state managed by VACUUM.
- b4af70cb2103 14.0 cited
-
Recycle nbtree pages deleted during same VACUUM.
- 9dd963ae2534 14.0 cited
-
snapshot scalability: Don't compute global horizons while building snapshots.
- dc7420c2c927 14.0 cited
-
Raise error when affecting tuple moved into different partition.
- f16241bef7cc 11.0 cited
Attachments
- v1-0001-Fix-vacuum-hang.patch (text/x-patch) patch v1-0001
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 11:19 PM Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, >> >> Obviously we should actually fix this on back branches, but could we >> at least make the retry loop interruptible in some way so people could >> use pg_cancel/terminate_backend() on a stuck autovacuum worker or >> vacuum process? > > > If the problem happens in versions <= PG 16, we don't have a good solution (vacuum process holds the exclusive lock cause checkpoint hangs). > > Maybe we can make the retry loop interruptible first. However, since we are using START_CRIT_SECTION, we cannot simply use CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS to handle it. As far as I can tell, in 14 and 15, the versions where the issue reported here is present, there is not a critical section in the section of code looped through in the retry loop in lazy_scan_prune(). We can actually fix the particular issue I reproduced with the attached patch. However, I think it is still worth making the retry loop interruptible in case there are other ways to end up infinitely looping in the retry loop in lazy_scan_prune(). - Melanie