Re: Memory leak from ExecutorState context?

Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik@garret.ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-05-18T22:27:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 6:35 PM Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
<jgdr@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 13:46:35 -0400
> Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 May 2023 16:00:52 -0400
> > > Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > There are some existing indentation issues in these files, but you can
> > > > leave those or put them in a separate commit.
> > >
> > > Reindented in v9.
> > >
> > > I put existing indentation issues in a separate commit to keep the actual
> > > patches clean from distractions.
> >
> > It is a matter of opinion, but I tend to prefer the commit with the fix
> > for the existing indentation issues to be first in the patch set.
>
> OK. moved in v10 patch set.

v10 LGTM.



Commits

  1. Describe hash join implementation