Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning

Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2024-01-18T14:53:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:33 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This does mean that something is not quite right with 0001 as well as
> 0004. We'd end up checking if we are at 8GB much more often. I should
> probably find a way to replicate the cadence on master.

I believe I've done this in attached v10.

- Melanie

Commits

  1. Combine FSM updates for prune and no-prune cases.

  2. Remove LVPagePruneState.

  3. Move VM update code from lazy_scan_heap() to lazy_scan_prune().

  4. Optimize vacuuming of relations with no indexes.

  5. Be more consistent about whether to update the FSM while vacuuming.

  6. Remove hastup from LVPagePruneState.

  7. Use scanned_pages to decide when to failsafe check.

  8. Simplify lazy_scan_heap's handling of scanned pages.

  9. While vacuuming a large table, update upper-level FSM data every so often.