Re: Can rs_cindex be < 0 for bitmap heap scans?
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Date: 2024-10-24T13:40:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thanks for the reply, Dilip! On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 12:50 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 3:45 AM Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> HeapScanDescData->rs_cindex (the current index into the array of >> visible tuples stored in the heap scan descriptor) is used for >> multiple scan types, but for bitmap heap scans, AFAICT, it should >> never be < 0. > > You are right it can never be < 0 in this case at least. Cool, thanks for confirming. I will commit this change then. > In fact you don't need to explicitly set it to 0 in initscan[1], because before calling heapam_scan_bitmap_next_tuple() we must call heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block() and this function is initializing this to 0 (hscan->rs_cindex = 0;). Anyway no object even if you prefer to initialize in initscan(), just the point is that we are already doing it for each block before fetching tuples from the block. I am inclined to still initialize it to 0 in initscan(). I was refactoring the bitmap heap scan code to use the read stream API and after moving some things around, this field was no longer getting initialized in heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block(). While that may not be a good reason to change it in this patch, most of the other fields in the heap scan descriptor (like rs_cbuf and rs_cblock) are re-initialized in initscan(), so it seems okay to do that there even though it isn't strictly necessary on master. - Melanie
Commits
-
Fix overflow danger in SampleHeapTupleVisible(), take 2
- 94bb6c4410d8 18.0 landed
-
Fix overflow danger in SampleHeapTupleVisible()
- 28328ec87b45 18.0 landed
-
Make rs_cindex and rs_ntuples unsigned
- 68d9662be1c4 18.0 landed