Re: eliminate xl_heap_visible to reduce WAL (and eventually set VM on-access)
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Remove table_scan_analyze_next_tuple unneeded parameter OldestXmin
- 284925508ae6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify visibility check in heap_page_would_be_all_visible()
- 3efe58febc3c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Eliminate use of cached VM value in lazy_scan_prune()
- 648a7e28d7c2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Combine visibilitymap_set() cases in lazy_scan_prune()
- 21796c267d0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix const qualification in prune_freeze_setup()
- 4877391ce894 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify vacuum visibility assertion
- bd298f54a0d6 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split heap_page_prune_and_freeze() into helpers
- e135e044572e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Assert that cutoffs are provided if freezing will be attempted
- cd38b7e77315 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split PruneFreezeParams initializers to one field per line
- 1e14edcea5e1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor heap_page_prune_and_freeze() parameters into a struct
- 1937ed70621e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make heap_page_is_all_visible independent of LVRelState
- 3e4705484e0c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Inline TransactionIdFollows/Precedes[OrEquals]()
- 43b05b38ea4d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add helper for freeze determination to heap_page_prune_and_freeze
- c8dd6542bae4 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Bump XLOG_PAGE_MAGIC after xl_heap_prune change
- 4a8fb58671d3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Correct prune WAL record opcode name in comment
- ae8ea7278c16 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes when vacuum discovers VM corruption
- 8ec97e78a771 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unused xl_heap_prune member, reason
- 4b5f206de2bb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unneeded VM pin from VM replay
- 3399c265543e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add assert and log message to visibilitymap_set
- e3d5ddb7ca91 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add error codes to some corruption log messages
- fd6ec93bf890 13.0 cited
Attachments
- v31-0001-Combine-visibilitymap_set-cases-in-lazy_scan_pru.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0001
- v31-0002-Eliminate-use-of-cached-VM-value-in-lazy_scan_pr.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0002
- v31-0003-Refactor-lazy_scan_prune-VM-clear-logic-into-hel.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0003
- v31-0004-Set-the-VM-in-heap_page_prune_and_freeze.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0004
- v31-0005-Move-VM-assert-into-prune-freeze-code.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0005
- v31-0006-Eliminate-XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE-from-vacuum-phase-I.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0006
- v31-0007-Eliminate-XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE-from-empty-page-vac.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0007
- v31-0008-Remove-XLOG_HEAP2_VISIBLE-entirely.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0008
- v31-0009-Simplify-heap_page_would_be_all_visible-visibili.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0009
- v31-0010-Remove-table_scan_analyze_next_tuple-unneeded-pa.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0010
- v31-0011-Use-GlobalVisState-in-vacuum-to-determine-page-l.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0011
- v31-0012-Unset-all_visible-sooner-if-not-freezing.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0012
- v31-0013-Track-which-relations-are-modified-by-a-query.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0013
- v31-0014-Pass-down-information-on-table-modification-to-s.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0014
- v31-0015-Allow-on-access-pruning-to-set-pages-all-visible.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0015
- v31-0016-Set-pd_prune_xid-on-insert.patch (text/x-patch) patch v31-0016
On Sat, Dec 20, 2025 at 7:32 AM Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi! I checked v29-0009, about HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon. Origins > of this code track down to fdf9e21196a6 which was committed as part of > [0], at which point > there was no HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon function. I guess this is > the reason this optimization was not performed earlier. Thanks for taking a look into this! > I also think this patch is correct, because we do similar things for > HEAPTUPLE_DEAD & HEAPTUPLE_RECENTLY_DEAD, and > HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon is just a proxy to > HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuumHorizon with only difference in DEAD VS > RECENTLY_DEAD handling. > > Similar change could be done at heapam_scan_analyze_next_tuple > > ... > case HEAPTUPLE_DEAD: > case HEAPTUPLE_RECENTLY_DEAD: > /* Count dead and recently-dead rows */ > *deadrows += 1; > break; In v30 sent here [1], I did end up making this change in 0010. I just realized that I should have also changed table_scan_analyze_next_tuple() and removed the call to GetOldestRemovableTransactionId(). I've done that in attached v31. I'm not sure we should change the table AM API (by removing OldestXmin), though. I looked for table AMs implementing scan_analyze_next_tuple() to see if they use OldestXmin. I found two: OrioleDB [2] and Citus columnar [3], which both implement scan_analyze_next_tuple() and neither of them use OldestXmin. I couldn't easily find other table AMs implementing scan_analyze_next_tuple(). I don't have a strong sense of whether or not I should make this change. Changing it is churn to a public API and doesn't specifically enable us to do something. I could also just leave it unused by heapam's implementation. I haven't checked what, if any, other table AMs callbacks have parameters completely unused by their heap implementation. So, I'm on the fence about whether or not to make the change at all, and, if I do, whether or not to change the table AM callback. That is done in v31, though, so we can discuss. - Melanie [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAKRu_ZCjHoRPfQ8AbMrFY8TOMCPAvZ0_m9SX7yg0edfTk45-g%40mail.gmail.com [2] https://github.com/orioledb/orioledb/blob/acff65984d106dabf708a179e2c6694297e08c02/src/tableam/handler.c#L978C68-L978C78 [3] https://github.com/citusdata/citus/blob/ee3812d267db3ab007efb6f5f432c82c1f448695/src/backend/columnar/columnar_tableam.c#L1418