Horton

Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring

Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>
Date: 2024-04-07T13:11:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sun, Apr 7, 2024 at 7:38 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/7/24 06:17, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> >> What bothers me on 0006-0008 is that the justification in the commit
> >> messages is "future commit will do something". I think it's fine to have
> >> a separate "prepareatory" patches (I really like how you structured the
> >> patches this way), but it'd be good to have them right before that
> >> "future" commit - I'd like not to have one in v17 and then the "future
> >> commit" in v18, because that's annoying complication for backpatching,
> >> (and probably also when implementing the AM?) etc.
> >
> > Yes, I was thinking about this also.
> >
>
> Good we're on the same page.

Having thought about this some more I think we need to stop here for
17. v20-0001 and v20-0002 both make changes to the table AM API that
seem bizarre and unjustifiable without the other changes. Like, here
we changed all your parameters because someday we are going to do
something! You're welcome!

Also, the iterators in the TableScanDescData might be something I
could live with in the source code for a couple months before we make
the rest of the changes in July+. But, adding them does push the
TableScanDescData->rs_parallel member into the second cacheline, which
will be true in versions of Postgres people are using for years. I
didn't perf test, but seems bad.

So, yes, unfortunately, I think we should pick up on the BHS saga in a
few months. Or, actually, we should start focusing on that parallel
BHS + 0 readahead bug and whether or not we are going to fix it.

Sorry for the about-face.

- Melanie

Commits

  1. Fix bitmapheapscan incorrect recheck of NULL tuples

  2. Increase default maintenance_io_concurrency to 16

  3. Separate TBM[Shared|Private]Iterator and TBMIterateResult

  4. Improve read_stream.c advice for dense streams.

  5. Increase default effective_io_concurrency to 16

  6. Delay extraction of TIDBitmap per page offsets

  7. Add lossy indicator to TBMIterateResult

  8. Move BitmapTableScan per-scan setup into a helper

  9. Add and use BitmapHeapScanDescData struct

  10. Fix bitmap table scan crash on iterator release

  11. Bitmap Table Scans use unified TBMIterator

  12. Add common interface for TBMIterators

  13. Make table_scan_bitmap_next_block() async-friendly

  14. Move EXPLAIN counter increment to heapam_scan_bitmap_next_block

  15. Refactor tidstore.c iterator buffering.

  16. BitmapHeapScan: Remove incorrect assert and reset field

  17. Change BitmapAdjustPrefetchIterator to accept BlockNumber

  18. BitmapHeapScan: Use correct recheck flag for skip_fetch

  19. BitmapHeapScan: Push skip_fetch optimization into table AM

  20. BitmapHeapScan: postpone setting can_skip_fetch

  21. BitmapHeapScan: begin scan after bitmap creation

  22. Fix EXPLAIN Bitmap heap scan to count pages with no visible tuples

  23. Remove redundant snapshot copying from parallel leader to workers

  24. Remove some obsolete smgrcloseall() calls.

  25. Remove the "snapshot too old" feature.

  26. Compute XID horizon for page level index vacuum on primary.