Re: Eagerly evict bulkwrite strategy ring

Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>

To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com>

Cc: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>

Date: 2025-10-15T21:00:30Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

v5-0001-Refactor-goto-into-for-loop-in-GetVictimBuffer.patch (text/x-patch) patch v5-0001
v5-0002-Split-FlushBuffer-into-two-parts.patch (text/x-patch) patch v5-0002
v5-0003-Eagerly-flush-bulkwrite-strategy-ring.patch (text/x-patch) patch v5-0003

On Fri, Sep 12, 2025 at 3:16 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks good to me. StrategySweepNextBuffer()'s comment is no longer
> correct, though.

Ah, thanks. I think I fixed that. I also rebased the set and attached v5.

- Melanie