Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>

From: Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
To: li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>
Cc: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-13T22:25:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

Attachments

Attaching V50 patch set which adds support for SECURITY LABEL commands.
Also fixed an issue in deparse_AlterRelation from the last conflict resolution.

On Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:37 PM li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I noticed that the issue of ownership seems to have not been considered.
> For example, if a user 'a' from the publishing side creates a table t1,
> the owner of t1 is not user 'a' after it is replicated to the subscribing side.
> This is a situation that has not been encountered in previous DML replication.
>
> I think the ownership relationship should not be lost,
> and we should perhaps add it back,
> like pg_dump "ALTER TABLE public.t1 OWNER TO a;",
> even though we do not currently support the replication of USER.

I agree that this is a useful scenario. On the other hand, I think it
also makes sense to keep the ownership of objects to the subscription
owner in other use cases. Maybe we can make it optional whether to
inherit the original ownership of the publisher on the subscriber
using a new subscription_parameter. For example, original_ownership:
CREATE SUBSCRIPTION mysub CONNECTION 'conninfo' PUBLICATION mypub WITH
(original_ownership=true);

Then we can change the apply worker to set the ownership of new
objects accordingly. We also need to make the owner information
available in the logicalddlmsg, currently we don't log this
information.

Regards,
Zheng