Re: Support logical replication of DDLs
Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
From: Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>
To: li jie <ggysxcq@gmail.com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>,
"houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-11-28T03:28:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.
- 482675987bcd 16.0 cited
-
Refactor pgoutput_change().
- da324d6cd45b 16.0 cited
-
Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.
- df931e9ab35b 11.20 landed
- c8a5f1685fb7 15.3 landed
- 4efb4f0d4878 13.11 landed
- 3dd287c14fac 12.15 landed
- 393430f57544 16.0 landed
- 14345f3c6a7b 14.8 landed
-
Fix object identity string for transforms
- 9a312562314a 16.0 landed
-
Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.
- 60684dd834a2 16.0 cited
-
Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType
- 840ff5f451cd 16.0 cited
-
Release cache tuple when no longer needed
- ed0fbc8e5ac9 15.0 cited
-
Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.
- 11da97024abb 14.0 cited
-
Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular
- a26116c6cbf4 11.0 cited
-
Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.
- 3a0d473192b2 10.0 cited
Attachments
- v40-0002-Support-DDL-replication.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v40-0002
- v40-0004-Test-cases-for-DDL-replication.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v40-0004
- v40-0003-Support-CREATE-TABLE-AS-SELECT-INTO.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v40-0003
- v40-0005-Do-not-generate-WAL-log-for-non-top-level-DDL-comman.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v40-0005
- v40-0001-Functions-to-deparse-DDL-commands.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v40-0001
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:23 PM Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > I have been following this patch for a long time. > > Recently, I started to try to test it. I found several bugs > > here and want to give you feedback. > > > > 1. CREATE TABLE LIKE > > I found that this case may be repication incorrectly. > > You can run the following SQL statement: > > ``` > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1 (a text CHECK (length(a) > 2) PRIMARY KEY, b text); > > ALTER TABLE ctlt1 ALTER COLUMN a SET STORAGE MAIN; > > ALTER TABLE ctlt1 ALTER COLUMN b SET STORAGE EXTERNAL; > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); > > ``` > > The ctlt1_like table will not be able to correct the replication. > > I think this is because create table like statement is captured by > > the event trigger to a create table statement and multiple alter table statements. > > There are some overlaps between them, and an error is reported when downstream replication occurs. > > I looked into this case. The root cause is the statement > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); > > is executed internally using 3 DDLs: > 1. CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); --The top level command > 2. ALTER TABLE ctlt1_like ADD CONSTRAINT ctlt1_a_check CHECK > (length(a) > 2); --The first subcommand > 3. CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ctlt1_like_pkey on ctlt1_like (a); --The second > subcommand that creates the primary key index > > All three commands are captured by the event trigger. The first and > second command ends up getting deparsed, WAL-logged and > replayed on the subscriber. The replay of the ALTER TABLE command > causes a duplicate constraint error. The problem is that > while subcommands are captured by event triggers by default, they > don't need to be deparsed and WAL-logged for DDL replication. > To do that we can pass the isCompleteQuery variable in > ProcessUtilitySlow to EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand() and > EventTriggerAlterTableEnd() and make this information available in > CollectedCommand so that any subcommands can be skipped. Attaching the proposed fix in v40-0005-Do-not-generate-WAL-log-for-non-top-level-DDL-comman.patch. This patch adds a new boolean field isTopLevelCommand to CollectedCommand so that non-top level command can be skipped in the DDL replication event trigger functions. The patch also makes the information available by passing the isTopLevel variable in ProcessUtilitySlow to several EventTriggerCollect functions such as EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand and EventTriggerAlterTableStart. > 2. ALTER TABLE (inherits) > case: > ``` > CREATE TABLE gtest30 ( > a int, > b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED > ); > CREATE TABLE gtest30_1 () INHERITS (gtest30); > ALTER TABLE gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION; > ``` > After this case is executed in the publication, the following error occurs in the subscription : > > ERROR: column "b" of relation "gtest30" is not a stored generated column > STATEMENT: ALTER TABLE public.gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION, ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION > > Obviously, the column modifications of the inherited table were also captured, Yes, I can confirm that the column modifications of the inherited table were also captured as a subcommand of "ALTER TABLE gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION;". This feels wrong to me, because the subcommand On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 5:23 PM Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > I have been following this patch for a long time. > > Recently, I started to try to test it. I found several bugs > > here and want to give you feedback. > > > > 1. CREATE TABLE LIKE > > I found that this case may be repication incorrectly. > > You can run the following SQL statement: > > ``` > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1 (a text CHECK (length(a) > 2) PRIMARY KEY, b text); > > ALTER TABLE ctlt1 ALTER COLUMN a SET STORAGE MAIN; > > ALTER TABLE ctlt1 ALTER COLUMN b SET STORAGE EXTERNAL; > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); > > ``` > > The ctlt1_like table will not be able to correct the replication. > > I think this is because create table like statement is captured by > > the event trigger to a create table statement and multiple alter table statements. > > There are some overlaps between them, and an error is reported when downstream replication occurs. > > I looked into this case. The root cause is the statement > > CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); > > is executed internally using 3 DDLs: > 1. CREATE TABLE ctlt1_like (LIKE ctlt1 INCLUDING ALL); --The top level command > 2. ALTER TABLE ctlt1_like ADD CONSTRAINT ctlt1_a_check CHECK > (length(a) > 2); --The first subcommand > 3. CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ctlt1_like_pkey on ctlt1_like (a); --The second > subcommand that creates the primary key index > > All three commands are captured by the event trigger. The first and > second command ends up getting deparsed, WAL-logged and > replayed on the subscriber. The replay of the ALTER TABLE command > causes a duplicate constraint error. The problem is that > while subcommands are captured by event triggers by default, they > don't need to be deparsed and WAL-logged for DDL replication. > To do that we can pass the isCompleteQuery variable in > ProcessUtilitySlow to EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand() and > EventTriggerAlterTableEnd() and make this information available in > CollectedCommand so that any subcommands can be skipped. Attaching the proposed fix in v40-0005-Do-not-generate-WAL-log-for-non-top-level-DDL-comman.patch. This patch adds a new boolean field isTopLevelCommand to CollectedCommand so that non-top level command can be skipped in the DDL replication event trigger functions. The patch also makes the information available by passing the isTopLevel variable in ProcessUtilitySlow to several EventTriggerCollect functions such as EventTriggerCollectSimpleCommand and EventTriggerAlterTableStart. > 2. ALTER TABLE (inherits) > case: > ``` > CREATE TABLE gtest30 ( > a int, > b int GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a * 2) STORED > ); > CREATE TABLE gtest30_1 () INHERITS (gtest30); > ALTER TABLE gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION; > ``` > After this case is executed in the publication, the following error occurs in the subscription : > > ERROR: column "b" of relation "gtest30" is not a stored generated column > STATEMENT: ALTER TABLE public.gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION, ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION > > Obviously, the column modifications of the inherited table were also captured, Yes, I can confirm that the column modifications of the inherited table gtest30_1 were also captured as a subcommand of "ALTER TABLE gtest30 ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION;". This feels wrong to me, because the subcommand "ALTER COLUMN b DROP EXPRESSION" is collected for ALTER TABLE gtest30 but it's actually meant for the inherited table gtest30_1. I think we should fix the capture of the subcommand in a way that we know it's meant to be executed on the inherited table gtest30_1. Regards, Zheng