Re: pg_get_multixact_members not documented
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
From: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-06-11T16:14:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v4-0001-Document-pg_get_multixact_members.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0001
> It's not clear, without some effort, which lock mode go with which row lock in that description. > For example, "keysh" does not have "for" in it but "fornokeyupd" does. How about rephrasing this > as "The lock modes "keysh", "sh", fornokeyupd", and "forupd" correspond to > <literal>FOR KEY SHARE</literal>, <literal>FOR SHARE</literal>, <literal>FOR NO KEY UPDATE</literal>, > and <literal>FOR UPDATE</literal> row level locks respectively as described in <xref linkend="locking-rows"/>." That works for me. > Do we want to add the section "Multixact Information Functions" after other transaction related > sections like "Transaction ID and Snapshot Information Function" and > " Committed Transaction Information Functions" instead of adding it at the end? makes sense. See v4 which addresses the points above. -- Sami
Commits
-
Document pg_get_multixact_members().
- f5551538bce0 17.6 landed
- e6115394d40c 19 (unreleased) landed
- e35a0174a9d2 14.19 landed
- d271b04dc64e 16.10 landed
- c8b9f75111aa 18.0 landed
- a167e654d06f 15.14 landed
- 0ee7f51a8b4e 13.22 landed