Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
From: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-18T18:06:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v10-0001-Implement-a-DSA-for-LWLock-tranche-names.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v10-0001
- v10-0002-Add-tests-for-LWLock-tranche-names-DSA.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v10-0002
> see v9 Sorry about the quick follow-up I was not happy with one of the comment updates in SyncLWLockTrancheNames. I updated it. Attached is v10, -- Sami
Commits
-
test_dsa: Avoid leaking LWLock tranches.
- c5c74282f2ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized entry.
- b26d76f64327 18.2 landed
- ac2800ddc185 17.8 landed
- 1165a933aab1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test harness for the LWLock tranche code.
- 16607718c010 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert recent change to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
- d814d7fc3d52 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move dynamically-allocated LWLock tranche names to shared memory.
- 38b602b0289f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Prepare DSM registry for upcoming changes to LWLock tranche names.
- 5487058b56e0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash().
- fe07100e82b0 19 (unreleased) cited