Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends

Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>

From: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>

To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>

Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-11-02T20:35:04Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> I am not sure we need to do anything about this.
>

Or maybe we just avoid the tranche_id from leaking
in test_dsa_resowners() by making it a static variable
and checking if we have a valid tranche id before calling
LWLockNewTrancheId()? That is the proper pattern.

--
Sami

Commits

test_dsa: Avoid leaking LWLock tranches.
- c5c74282f2ea 19 (unreleased) landed
Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized entry.
- b26d76f64327 18.2 landed
- ac2800ddc185 17.8 landed
- 1165a933aab1 19 (unreleased) landed
Add a test harness for the LWLock tranche code.
- 16607718c010 19 (unreleased) landed
Revert recent change to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
- d814d7fc3d52 19 (unreleased) landed
Move dynamically-allocated LWLock tranche names to shared memory.
- 38b602b0289f 19 (unreleased) landed
Prepare DSM registry for upcoming changes to LWLock tranche names.
- 5487058b56e0 19 (unreleased) landed
Add GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash().
- fe07100e82b0 19 (unreleased) cited