Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
From: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-04T20:23:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2025 at 11:32:19AM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote: > > With a local hash table, I don't think it's necessary to introduce new > > code for managing > > a DSA based list of tranche names as is done in v3. We can go back to > > storing the shared > > trance names in dshash. > > > > What do you think? > > My first thought is that a per-backend hash table seems too > expensive/complicated for this. Couldn't it just be an array like we have > now? We can, but I was considering simplicity of implementation, and using a local hash table is slightly simpler. That said, since we're dealing with an append-only data structure, a hash table is probably more than we need. All we need is index-based lookup, so I’ll go with the local array to mirror the shared ( dsa ) array. -- Sami
Commits
-
test_dsa: Avoid leaking LWLock tranches.
- c5c74282f2ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized entry.
- b26d76f64327 18.2 landed
- ac2800ddc185 17.8 landed
- 1165a933aab1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test harness for the LWLock tranche code.
- 16607718c010 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert recent change to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
- d814d7fc3d52 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move dynamically-allocated LWLock tranche names to shared memory.
- 38b602b0289f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Prepare DSM registry for upcoming changes to LWLock tranche names.
- 5487058b56e0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash().
- fe07100e82b0 19 (unreleased) cited