Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends
Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
From: Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>,
Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-08-22T20:49:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 3:01 PM Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> If there is agreement on setting limits, may I propose > >> 1024 tranches and NAMEDATALEN. Both seem reasonably sufficient. > > > Let's proceed with that approach for now. We can worry about the exact > > limits once this is closer to commit. > > v11 implements the fixed size shared memory as discussed. One point I did not make earlier is that the tranche name lengths will need to be as long as we allow in dsm_registry.c. ``` #define DSMR_NAME_LEN 128 #define DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX " DSA" #define DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX_LEN (sizeof(DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX) - 1) #define DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_NAME_LEN (DSMR_NAME_LEN + DSMR_DSA_TRANCHE_SUFFIX_LEN) ``` We should make the limits external (in lwlock.h) and dsa_registery.c can enforce based on those values. -- Sami
Commits
-
test_dsa: Avoid leaking LWLock tranches.
- c5c74282f2ea 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Teach DSM registry to ERROR if attaching to an uninitialized entry.
- b26d76f64327 18.2 landed
- ac2800ddc185 17.8 landed
- 1165a933aab1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test harness for the LWLock tranche code.
- 16607718c010 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert recent change to RequestNamedLWLockTranche().
- d814d7fc3d52 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move dynamically-allocated LWLock tranche names to shared memory.
- 38b602b0289f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Prepare DSM registry for upcoming changes to LWLock tranche names.
- 5487058b56e0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add GetNamedDSA() and GetNamedDSHash().
- fe07100e82b0 19 (unreleased) cited