Re: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays?
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
Cc: shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com>,
Shlok Kyal <shlok.kyal.oss@gmail.com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda.hayato@fujitsu.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Date: 2025-12-03T05:28:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Rename column slotsync_skip_at to slotsync_last_skip.
- 5db6a344abc2 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add slotsync_skip_reason column to pg_replication_slots view.
- e68b6adad96d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix test failure caused by commit 76b78721ca.
- e3e787ca0234 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix a BF failure caused by commit 76b78721ca.
- 3df4df53b06d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add slotsync skip statistics.
- 76b78721ca49 19 (unreleased) landed
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 3:37 PM Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 03:30:48PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > I suggested the current one because having the last was making the > > column name bit longer, and anyway the description clarifies it, but I > > see your point. So, the other options could be > > slotsync_last_skip_time, sync_last_skip_time, last_slotsync_skip_time, > > last_sync_skip_time . > > I also noticed while going through src/backend/catalog/system_views.sql > that *_last_*_time is rare, so in terms of brevity, removing the _time > at the end would be ok. "last_" already conveys time/a timestamp. > I think it depends on case to case but having last in the similar cases seems to be a common practice. So, again thinking about it based on your suggestion and looking at existing fields, I suggest we should rename slotsync_skip_at to slotsync_last_skip. This is similar to checksum_last_failure. I think there is a value in keeping initials the same for similar fields in the view as users could easily identify the related columns while querying the view. For example, checksum_failures and checksum_last_failure in pg_stat_database. Anyone else have any opinion on the names proposed here? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.