Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tighten the concurrent abort check during decoding.
- 2ce353fc1902 14.0 landed
-
Improve hash_create()'s API for some added robustness.
- b3817f5f7746 14.0 landed
-
Use HASH_BLOBS for xidhash.
- a1b8aa1e4eec 14.0 landed
-
Fix initialization of RelationSyncEntry for streaming transactions.
- 69bd60672af6 14.0 landed
-
Remove unused function declaration in logicalproto.h.
- ddd5f6d2609b 14.0 landed
-
Add additional tests to test streaming of in-progress transactions.
- 58b5ae9d62bd 14.0 landed
-
Fix inline marking introduced in commit 464824323e.
- ac15b499f7f9 14.0 landed
-
Add support for streaming to built-in logical replication.
- 464824323e57 14.0 landed
-
Fix the SharedFileSetUnregister API.
- 4ab77697f67a 14.0 landed
-
Fix comment in procarray.c
- 77c7267c37f7 14.0 cited
-
Suppress compiler warning in non-cassert builds.
- e942af7b8261 14.0 cited
-
Extend the BufFile interface.
- 808e13b282ef 14.0 landed
-
Mark a few logical decoding related variables with PGDLLIMPORT.
- b48cac3b10a0 14.0 landed
-
Implement streaming mode in ReorderBuffer.
- 7259736a6e5b 14.0 landed
-
Extend the logical decoding output plugin API with stream methods.
- 45fdc9738b36 14.0 landed
-
WAL Log invalidations at command end with wal_level=logical.
- c55040ccd017 14.0 landed
-
Immediately WAL-log subtransaction and top-level XID association.
- 0bead9af484c 14.0 landed
-
Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.
- 9de77b545313 14.0 cited
-
Only superuser can set sslcert/sslkey in postgres_fdw user mappings
- cebf9d6e6ee1 13.0 cited
-
Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.
- 9290ad198b15 13.0 landed
-
Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.
- cec2edfa7859 13.0 landed
-
logical decoding: process ASSIGNMENT during snapshot build
- bac2fae05c77 13.0 cited
-
Emit invalidations to standby for transactions without xid.
- c6ff84b06a68 9.6.0 cited
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:00 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello. > > At Fri, 13 Dec 2019 14:46:20 +0530, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote in > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:46 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 3:32 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I have rebased the patch set on the latest head. > > > > > > 0001 looks like a clever approach, but are you sure it doesn't hurt > > > performance when many small XLOG records are being inserted? I think > > > XLogRecordAssemble() can get pretty hot in some workloads. > > > > > > With regard to 0002, logging a separate WAL record for each > > > invalidation seems painful; I think most operations that generate > > > invalidations generate a bunch of them all at once. Perhaps you could > > > just queue up invalidations as they happen, and then force anything > > > that's been queued up to be emitted into WAL just before you emit any > > > WAL record that might need to be decoded. > > > > > > > I feel we can log the invalidations of the entire command at one go if > > we log at CommandEndInvalidationMessages. We already have all the > > invalidations of current command in > > transInvalInfo->CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs. This can save us the effort of > > maintaining a new separate list/queue for invalidations and to a good > > extent, it will ameliorate your concern of logging each invalidation > > separately. > > I have a question on this. Does that mean that the current logical > decoder (or reorderbuffer) > What does currently refer to here? Is it about HEAD or about the patch? Without the patch, we decode only at commit time and by that time we have all invalidations (logged with commit WAL record), so we just execute them at each catalog change (see the actions in REORDER_BUFFER_CHANGE_INTERNAL_COMMAND_ID). The patch has to separately WAL log each invalidation because we can decode the intermittent changes, so we can't wait till commit. The above is just an optimization for the patch. AFAIK, there is no correctness issue here, but let me know if you see any. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com