Horton

Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com
Date: 2022-04-11T05:04:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 5:04 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> On 2022-Apr-08, Amit Kapila wrote:
>
>
> > For runtime conditions, one of the things you have mentioned in that
> > thread is to add schema name in the statement at the required places
> > which this patch deals with in a different way by explicitly sending
> > it along with the DDL statement.
>
> Hmm, ok.  The point of the JSON-blob route is that the publisher sends a
> command representation that can be parsed/processed/transformed
> arbitrarily by the subscriber using generic rules; it should be trivial
> to use a JSON tool to change schema A to schema B in any arbitrary DDL
> command, and produce another working DDL command without having to know
> how to write that command specifically.  So if I have a rule that
> "schema A there is schema B here", all DDL commands can be replayed with
> no further coding (without having to rely on getting the run-time
> search_path correct.)
>

Okay, thanks for the clarification.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.