Re: Enumize logical replication message actions

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-11-02T08:45:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 5:52 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 17:37, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Other than that the patch looks good to me.
>>
>
> Patch with updated commit message and also the list of reviewers
>

Thanks, pushed!

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



Commits

  1. Use Enums for logical replication message types at more places.

  2. Use Enum for top level logical replication message types.