Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

To: Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com>

Cc: Kashif Zeeshan <kashif.zeeshan@enterprisedb.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar.raghuwanshi@enterprisedb.com>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>

Date: 2020-04-21T04:27:31Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Fix failures in incremental_sort due to number of workers
- 23ba3b5ee278 13.0 cited
In jsonb_plpython.c, suppress warning message from gcc 10.
- a06921816370 13.0 cited
Fix minor problems with non-exclusive backup cleanup.
- 303640199d04 13.0 cited

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Asif Rehman <asifr.rehman@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I forgot to make a check for no-manifest. Fixed. Attached is the updated
> patch.
>
>
Have we done any performance testing with this patch to see the benefits?
If so, can you point me to the results? If not, then can we perform some
tests on large backups to see the benefits of this patch/idea?

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com