Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10@gmail.com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh.rs0541@gmail.com>, Hou, Zhijie/侯 志杰 <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Date: 2022-05-10T12:39:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Add a run_as_owner option to subscriptions.

  2. Refactor pgoutput_change().

  3. Print the correct aliases for DML target tables in ruleutils.

  4. Fix object identity string for transforms

  5. Add grantable MAINTAIN privilege and pg_maintain role.

  6. Get rid of recursion-marker values in enum AlterTableType

  7. Release cache tuple when no longer needed

  8. Empty search_path in logical replication apply worker and walsender.

  9. Refactor format_type APIs to be more modular

  10. Use wrappers of PG_DETOAST_DATUM_PACKED() more.

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 4:59 PM Ajin Cherian <itsajin@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 11:24 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> > As we have hacked CreatePublication function for this POC, the
> > regression tests are not passing but we can easily change it so that
> > we invoke new functionality with the syntax proposed in this thread or
> > with some other syntax and we shall do that in the next patch unless
> > this approach is not worth pursuing.
> >
> > This POC is prepared by Ajin Cherian, Hou-San, and me.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > [1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150215044814.GL3391%40alvh.no-ip.org
>
> I have updated Amit's patch by including a public action "create" when
> creating publication which is turned off by default.
> Now the 'make check' tests pass. I also fixed a problem that failed to
> create tables when the table has a primary key.
>

Are these the correct set of patches? I don't see a DDL support patch.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.