Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-07-16T06:06:14Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v4-0001-Don-t-allow-to-set-replication-slot_name-as.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0001
- v4-0002-Update-comments-for-AlterSubscription.patch (application/octet-stream) patch v4-0002
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 8:20 AM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 18:17, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:43 PM Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Please consider review v3 patch. v3-0001 adds slot_name verification in > parse_subscription_options() and comments for why we need disable subscription > where set slot_name to NONE. > I think we back-patch this bug-fix till v10 where it was introduced and update the comments only in HEAD. So, accordingly, I moved the changes into two patches and changed the comments a bit. Can you please test the first patch in back-branches? I'll also do it separately. > v3-0002 comes from Ranier Vilela, it reduce the > overhead strlen in ReplicationSlotValidateName(). > I think this patch has nothing to do with this bug-fix, so I suggest you discuss this in a separate patch. Personally, I don't think it will help in reducing any overhead but there doesn't appear to be any harm in changing it as proposed. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
Commits
-
Don't allow to set replication slot_name as ''.
- 22fd784afda3 10.18 landed
- eb158e74afaf 11.13 landed
- f2f459f182fc 12.8 landed
- bfa2a926daf8 13.4 landed
- 40295d158fd4 14.0 landed
- 29abde637bbb 15.0 landed
-
Update comments for AlterSubscription.
- dcecdfafbd2d 15.0 landed