Horton

Re: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication

Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: "houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com" <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-09-13T02:15:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 11:58 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 7:57 AM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> > <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >> I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
> >> so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
> >> passed regression test.
>
> > Pushed!
>
> Shouldn't the CF entry for this be closed? [1]
>

Yes, and I have done that now.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Commits

  1. Invalidate relcache for publications defined for all tables.