Re: Parallel Append implementation
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
From: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
To: Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Rafia Sabih <rafia.sabih@enterprisedb.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-10-06T03:19:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ok. How about removing pa_all_partial_subpaths altogether , and
> instead of the below condition :
>
> /*
> * If all the child rels have partial paths, and if the above Parallel
> * Append path has a mix of partial and non-partial subpaths, then consider
> * another Parallel Append path which will have *all* partial subpaths.
> * If enable_parallelappend is off, make this one non-parallel-aware.
> */
> if (partial_subpaths_valid && !pa_all_partial_subpaths)
> ......
>
> Use this condition :
> if (partial_subpaths_valid && pa_nonpartial_subpaths != NIL)
> ......
>
Sounds good to me.
One minor point:
+ if (!node->as_padesc)
+ {
+ /*
+ */
+ if (!exec_append_seq_next(node))
+ return ExecClearTuple(node->ps.ps_ResultTupleSlot);
+ }
It seems either you want to add a comment in above part of patch or
you just left /**/ mistakenly.
> ----
>
>
> Regarding a mix of partial and non-partial paths, I feel it always
> makes sense for the leader to choose the partial path.
>
Okay, but why not cheapest partial path?
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Update parallel.sgml for Parallel Append
- ac535cd47806 11.0 landed
- e80f2b335ecd 12.0 landed
-
Support Parallel Append plan nodes.
- ab7271677812 11.0 landed
-
Remove BufFile's isTemp flag.
- 11e264517dff 11.0 cited
-
Improve comments for parallel executor estimation functions.
- 11c1d555cebe 11.0 landed
-
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan.
- 41b0dd987d44 11.0 cited
-
Eat XIDs more efficiently in recovery TAP test.
- 08aed6604de2 10.0 cited
-
Avoid syntax error on platforms that have neither LOCALE_T nor ICU.
- 457a44487328 10.0 cited
-
Preparatory refactoring for parallel merge join support.
- a71f10189dc1 10.0 cited